Can torture be ethical Discuss in relation to the War on Terror Essay

washbowl torture be ethical Discuss in relation to the War on Terror - audition Examplethither were often galore(postnominal) manuals given to convey the torture techniques and the implications. Written codes and conducts were also great deal to redefine the process of torture and differentiate what is acceptable and what is impermissible (Scott, 2003, p27). As the theories enhanced, there is a wide debate on the torture moralistic philosophy which is going on since years, and especially after 2001 when there was an enterprise of the struggle on terror by collaboration of many countries. Some debate that torture has evermore been immoral and unjustifiable, whereas many of the modern theorists and socialists suggest that if torturing an evil man because of which many lives lavatory be saved, and so there is no better moral decision that could be taken (Wisnewski, Emerick, 2009, p 78). Thus, fight on terror is a justifiable process which is carried prohibited throughout the Western world, and if it includes the practices of torturing then torture foundation be gestateed ethical too, in a broad scope. There are many ethical arguments that have risen up related to torture and its value to the society. The major argument that supports the ethics or torture is the fact that it is an essential tool. Many of the countries condemn the use of torture and consider it non only unethical but also unlawful. Whereas many countries still use it as their tool and consider it as effective in many circumstances (Harbury, 2005, p95). There are many arguments placed off and the basic debate lie in the views presented by deontological and utilitarian viewpoints. Both the viewpoints hold justification in their own way. The utilitarian viewpoint suggests that torture can be justified if the overall outcome of the execution is positive. This refers to the process of torture which is employ as a tool to investigate and weed the evil out of a person or criminal. In th is belief, the utilitarian thinker might consider the outcome as the only source of judgment and to decide whether the act of torturing is moral or not. The outcome can define the long term effects in which lives may be saved and evil may be finished. This is the primary factor on which torture is use as a tool (Greenberg, 2006, p50). fence the utilitarian view is the deontological view which came from the word duty. This viewpoint suggests that the rules and values hold immense importance and they should be fulfilled as the first priority rather than the outcome. Utilitarian thinkers give immense respect to the moral values and ethics over the outcomes of allowing torture or restricting it. However, if the outcome is uncertain or can not be known, then the utilitarian thinker would state that torture is wrong and unjustifiable (Skerker, 2010, p154). There are any arguments seen favoring the utilitarian views against torture and in some parts of the world, the laws support these v iews as well. The war on terror or war on terrorism is known to describe the campaign set out by the US and includes many other countries such as the UK. The term is commonly used and it applies to the campaign which is initiated against the al-Qaeda and other free-enterprise(a) groups which are associated to it. The aim of this campaign was to eliminate the powers and actions of such competitive organizations. The September 11 attack on the World Trade Centre gave rise to many militant groups that tend to declare war against America. These groups were the terrorists and in regard to those, the phrase War on Terror was used and made popular by the military organizations of the US. Soon it became